At this event Science Europe launches the updated edition of its Guide for Aligning Research Data Management across Europe, now with a new DMP evaluation rubric.
Sharing and re-use of research data are essential to verify research findings and foster new research. Science Europe promotes data sharing by working on the alignment of research data management policies and practices, and supports researchers with clear guidance.
Why does research data matter?
Quality-assured research data are key building blocks of the research process and often generate impact that goes well beyond their initial purpose. Sharing and re-use of data are seen as good scientific practice. It is indispensable in verifying research findings and can help to maximise the value of the original investment as the data are highly valuable in terms of supporting new research.
Science Europe’s Member Organisations either have a research data policy in place which they update when needed or are currently developing policies. They aim to encourage their researchers to share their data and to provide researchers with guidance on good data management.
What are the current priorities?
Science Europe supports the sharing of data and promotes data being FAIR, i.e. Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Re-usable. Data sharing requires good research data management (RDM). There is currently a lot of variation in RDM policies which can be confusing for researchers. Science Europe fosters the international alignment of RDM policies to facilitate RDM for researchers. RDM should not be a bureaucratic burden but a useful support when planning and conducting a research project.
What is Science Europe doing to achieve these aims?
Over the last two years, Science Europe has issued two publications, the ‘Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management’ and the ‘Framework for Discipline-specific Research Data Management policies.’ Both publications aim to align RDM policies across organisations. Science Europe promotes and builds on these outputs to achieve an even broader alignment across the research stakeholder community. The aim is to support researchers in their data management by providing clarity and clear guidelines, and reduce any administrative burden.
|Austria||Austrian Science Fund||FWF||Katharina Rieck|
|Belgium||Fund for Scientific Research||F.R.S-FNRS||Jean-Claude Kita|
|Belgium||Research Foundation Flanders||FWO||Alexandra Vandervelde|
|Denmark||Danish council for Independent Research||DFF||Johanne Thorup Dalgaard|
|Finland||Academy of Finland||AKA||Harri Hautala|
|France||French National Research Agency||ANR||Zoé Ancion|
|Germany||German Research Foundation||DFG||Michael Royeck|
|Germany||German Research Foundation||DFG||Stefan Winkler-Nees|
|Ireland||Health Research Board||HRB||Patricia Clarke|
|Ireland||Health Research Board||HRB||Sharon Kappala|
|Italy||National Institute for Nuclear Physics||INFN||Tommaso Boccali|
|Lithuania||Research Council of Lituania||LMT||Artūras Kaklauskas|
|Lithuania||Research Council of Lituania||LMT||Ramunė Rudokienė|
|Luxembourg||National Research Fund||FNR||Tom Jakobs|
|Netherlands||Dutch Research Council||NWO||Hans de Jonge|
|Netherlands||Dutch Research Council||NWO||Maria Cruz|
|Norway||Research Council of Norway||RCN||Anne Elisabeth Solsnes|
|Poland||Foundation for Polish Science||FNP||Barbara Wajnchold|
|Poland||National Science Centre||NCN||Laura Bandura-Morgan|
|Portugal||Foundation for Science and Technology||FCT||Filipa Pereira|
|Spain||Spanish National Research Council||CSIC||Fernando Aguilar|
|Spain||Spanish National Research Council||CSIC||Joaquín Tintoré|
|Sweden||Swedish Research Council||VR||Sanja Halling|
|Switzerland||Swiss National Science Foundation||SNSF||Katrin Milzow|
|Switzerland||Swiss National Science Foundation||SNSF||Cornelia Sommer|
|United Kingdom||UK Research and Innovation||UKRI||Geraldine Clement-Stoneham|
|United Kingdom||UK Research and Innovation||UKRI||Mark Thorley|
In its response to the European Commission, Science Europe highlights that future EU legislation on AI needs to strike the right balance between safeguards for users and developers of AI systems, and a legal environment that fosters R&I.
In its response to the European Commission Roadmap for an upcoming legislative proposal on the governance of common European data spaces, Science Europe reinforces the need to consider sectoral policies to ensure coherence.
Implementing Research Data Management Policies Across Europe: Experiences from Science Europe Member Organisations
Does your organisation want to develop requirements for data management plans (DMPs) or update existing ones?
Take a look at our latest publication to find out how to do so in three steps.
Science Europe has been appointed as one of 11 members of the new Executive Board of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC).
Our Practical Guide to the International Alignment of Research Data Management was officially release in January 2019. Ten months later, the guide’s recommendations have found their way into a number of organisational and, in some cases, even national Open Science or data management policies.
Developed by experts from Science Europe Member Organisations, this guide aims to align research data management (RDM) requirements across various research organisations. Science Europe will work to promote these requirements in order to ensure they are accepted by as many stakeholders as possible.
Science Europe and the Dutch Research Council (NWO) launch an initiative for the voluntary international alignment of research data management policies.
Research organisations and funders increasingly ask researchers to create Data Management Plans for their work and proposals. A lack of standardisation means that these can be time-consuming to create and difficult to compare and evaluate. Science Europe presents a framework for the creation of domain-specific protocols that can be used as standardised templates, reducing the administrative burden on both researchers, research organisations, and funders.